<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Emails Discovered in Viacom Case: Smoking Gun or Wet Blanket?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copyrightandtechnology.com/2009/10/08/youtube-emails-discovered-in-viacom-case-smoking-gun-or-wet-blanket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copyrightandtechnology.com/2009/10/08/youtube-emails-discovered-in-viacom-case-smoking-gun-or-wet-blanket/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about the market for rights technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property Expert Group (ipeg) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media Industry’s Push against Network Service Providers</title>
		<link>http://copyrightandtechnology.com/2009/10/08/youtube-emails-discovered-in-viacom-case-smoking-gun-or-wet-blanket/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Expert Group (ipeg) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media Industry’s Push against Network Service Providers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightandtechnology.com/?p=372#comment-1508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As I noted last October, Viacom should not have wanted to win this case at the lower court level.  Its preferred outcome ought to be to get the law changed so that website operators like YouTube have the responsibility to ensure that unauthorized copyrighted content doesn’t go up in the first place.  Certain technologies such as video fingerprinting are necessary in carrying out this responsibility. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I noted last October, Viacom should not have wanted to win this case at the lower court level.  Its preferred outcome ought to be to get the law changed so that website operators like YouTube have the responsibility to ensure that unauthorized copyrighted content doesn’t go up in the first place.  Certain technologies such as video fingerprinting are necessary in carrying out this responsibility. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

